Victoria’s Secret’s parent company is facing legal action – not for the bra and underwear designs it is being called out for swiping from ex-employee Jennifer Zuccarini’s label Fleur du Mal – but instead, for allegedly violating federal securities laws by making “materially false and misleading statements and/or failing to disclose adverse information regarding L Brands’ business and prospects,” thereby, causing investors to pay “artificially inflated prices for L Brands common stock,” only to have stock prices fall late last year, and throughout this year, as well.
Disney Sued for Misleading Investors About Disney+
Washington DC's 500 Most Influential People of 2023
The Inner Workings of Victoria's Secret: A Chairman and His Circle
I was roommates with a VS model — she kept disturbing items in her
Struggling Victoria's Secret reportedly to be sold at $1.1B
Victoria's Secret parent L Brands (LB) to cut 15% of corporate jobs
Victoria's Secret owner Les Wexner, 82, 'mocked idea of
Prince Harry's lawyer implicates Rupert Murdoch in cover-up of
Victoria's Secret Falls on Weak Guidance in Faltering Turnaround
TFL, Author at The Fashion Law - Page 34 of 201
74: Women's relationship to money, budgeting vs investing and
Victoria's Secret's Parent Co. and Execs Misled Investors About
TFL, Author at The Fashion Law - Page 34 of 201